The school serves the attainment of a qualification, which in turn should serve to a job, but how to determine what to study? what will your future if educational level is not expected immediately resulting in a job? Currently, the certainty with which to continue their studies can only belong to those who knows to have a recommendation, and then what is or may be, or become, if a nursery school for future recommendations? In other words it is not to improve but to maintain a social status, unless there is a continued immigration of aliens ready to take the places worst social.
The question is whether it is lawful to the phenomenon of the recommendation. The recommendation is the way in which it retains a social status. A father to his son the social opportunities of which he himself enjoyed. But who else but a father to a boy can transfer their experience and culture, rather than relying all'incuria of a public school, which sooner or later he will leave himself?!
Everyone from kids, have a lot of potential that we no longer have as adults, and should take advantage from an early age, and this is possible only are we educated and trained in the family already. and how to determine which field of study a student must choose, in order to avoid confusion, loss of time and drop-out?
Everyone from kids, have a lot of potential that we no longer have as adults, and should take advantage from an early age, and this is possible only are we educated and trained in the family already. and how to determine which field of study a student must choose, in order to avoid confusion, loss of time and drop-out?
If many young people drop out of school, this does not depend on a lower capacity, but the privileges achieved by some, which may lead others to choose a subordinate role in society, so that you experience many ingisutizie hidden in order to kick away people in need of a recommendation.
compulsory education must continue until the acquisition of the ability to read and write, or it must be associated with a job?
If you want the opportunity to continue studies beyond the minimum, you should combine the qualifications for a job so that you do not waste time in a state of unemployment, but then take over another type of selection made of the most difficult and promotions failures easier.
If you want the opportunity to continue studies beyond the minimum, you should combine the qualifications for a job so that you do not waste time in a state of unemployment, but then take over another type of selection made of the most difficult and promotions failures easier.
currently use are expected to get a special announcement, that should be abolished.
You make too selective as having the opportunity of a place for everyone, but they represent a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless, a waste of time and money. It is important that the study is fueled by direct access to a workplace, which guarantees economic, and be guaranteed a job even if it means having to share equally any minimum employment status. Any attempt to reform the public school is stopped by a confused chorus of protests by students and teachers. While teachers are concerned only to preserve their jobs rather than contribute to the efficiency of the education system, students, however, boycotting classes, why do not you love the school, why do not do any good. That teacher is a category of privileged workers: they not only never go on strike, so do not lose anything of salary, as is the case with all other workers, but for you to take advantage of students scioperino for them, with a force participation and social benefits which are not in any other category. It would be fair that every time there is a student strike, was being considered as a teachers' strike, with its curtailment of salary, as if the teachers were on strike, in order to inhibit this abnormal phenomenon of the student strike, which takes time to study and delays the educational attainment of young people. If young people want to protest and debate about the issues the school must do so in the evening hours of free time. The student protests only serve to provoke more in education spending, to pay for more teachers to increase their number, as if to change the school should just spend more. The school as an organization, however, remains the same. Students strike When, ignoring what he expects will have finished their studies, they are just fools who protest against someone who can not identify.
In school, students must be divided according to different behavioral characteristics, different attitudes, skills'. Keep them all together without distinction can 'only make it more' difficult teaching and learning time delay.
The differentiation of students in classrooms and schools, is to cover all aspects of identity 'and behavior, sex, social class, from bullying to inhibition, and this is not because' it must be provided only to some, considered the most ' the''good''chance 'to attain the highest' high education, judgments that are stupid and useless, but because 'bringing together people with similar characteristics, and' possible deal in a more 'simple and unique for their defect, and in exploiting the advantages. If you put together rather indiscriminately, should be much more 'time and effort to understand and enhance all the qualities' of each. Education must change with the organization of work. The education being made compulsory for all, all can lead to the highest level of studies, but at the same time is divided into many technical guidelines. But how does it shape the student with a specific interest? The school does not really decide which field of study to pursue, and therefore must remain generally the same for everyone, to the extent that is required.
The school is focused on a working occupation, But what happens when jobs are not there? What many students do not even have more reason to study, because they already know that their studies will be useless.
would therefore be useful to associate to study the possibility of a job, right from the start, ensuring that all their jobs. Combining the school, a specific work activity, through a reform of the right to work, it is more productive schooling.
Although the State has provided scholarships for the poor, won the only long after the profit school that is not really recognize all of the study from the same economic opportunities.
now to get a job contests are planned, which instead should be abolished. Being too selective, as it lacks the possibility of a place for everyone, they are already a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless and a waste of time and even money.
that the study should be encouraged, not scholarships, but a job, that is a guarantee economic, social, and not just grades and titles now futile. The qualification must be associated to the workplace, even if it means having to share equally in work hours and income.
who dropped out of school? Those who lack a foundation of economic subsistence.
Students choose an address of studies that give them the chance to get some job in the future, instead of moving towards higher education such as scientific research, for which they do not know if you get a job.
Many students are forced to abandon their studies, or to give them an address less demanding, because they do not receive sufficient financial support from either family, the school must offer the least support, what could be the opportunity to enjoy a meal public, and if he continued his studies with success, even more.
public education is mandatory, as it can not establish an address to the studies, as it is a right for all, must be essential in their subjects and then have only one address, to be only theoretical, scientific and philosophical. It must be added numerous short courses and technical and professional, who can follow the development of the region where you live, and then a concrete future economic gain. The school must therefore be twofold.
The school from my point of view should be open both morning and evening. In fact, I think, in diverse times, that afternoon and evening, you should always keep in classes and rehearsals, because in this way we could follow the same lesson several times, for those who were late, and also because it is accessible to all, and all ages, therefore also for those in employment or deemed too late to start over, because we all have to learn something new, to better address the problem of unemployment. The school must be open to all and at all times, because culture is an important basis for the development of a nation.
The school must also make a selection, which on the basis of the conduct, aspirations, the potential of an individual, must divide the students in schools that follow different speeds. In this way there would be no rivalry between those students who cause a slowdown of teaching. Do not want to listen to the lesson, not wanting to study at home, it slows down and reduces programs to those who wants to study more. So it would be useful questions occur as a university, that is, outside of class hours in order to prevent the listlessness of the student, a phenomenon typical of the school. In this way, and that is bringing together students with the same capacity for learning, leisure students would not be overloaded with homework and further repetition: the school must recognize that life is made of a student's other needs, the school can not or is unable to meet, for which the student must return to the entertainment venues, and if missing, must organize it, otherwise the student will not be able to concentrate on their studies, because the possibility of relaxation is proportional to the possibility of merger.
Women and men are not equal. Women have a different kind of sensitivity and intelligence. The right to equal opportunities for women must be viewed in relation to the duties imposed on men. The student population is equalized, in reality, however, encourages women who have already monopolized the teaching at school and thus have embraced the possibility of academic success (given that academic success is or will become a prerogative of the sons of teachers) ; the male teachers were extinct. So I think they are necessary only schools whose teachers are men. Should also realize that the freedom of teaching, education of a child, can not be entrusted to one person (and autonomy), because there is an increased risk of poor will eventually find. Among the closed walls of a classroom happens that teachers do not teach anything, partly because the students want to study. Education must therefore be controlled not by parents but by a special camera from another room, or two teachers for each subject.
Strikes students highlight the waste of time for young people, public resources, the lack of awareness of students about their future. In public schools the student assemblies should only be permitted at times other than those of courses, or become an excuse for not studying, and already does a bit. The strike is really an excuse with which students (as well as the professors who want to work less and less) reduces the amount imposed on them in the study, and if anyone is able to study more instead, he was invited to give up.
Broadcasting can be a source of information and culture, but you should have different thematic stations with addresses in order to meet the cultural needs of everyone, and especially to get people to cultivate new ones.
The television programming should not adapt to the needs of all viewers to increase listening, but those preferences of viewers more diligent in improving quality.
Lacking quality television exerts a tyranny.
bullying that occur when we meet in front of the TV company, and did not agree on what program to follow, and always wins who wants to see the program less cultural.
There must therefore be a limit to the emergence of new channels, provided they address cultural educational information only.
The television should be repeated periodically in order to be followed at different times, and then by all.
Thus those who stay home because they are unemployed would be able to learn something more than watching television.
TV news should be different: the best choice to differentiate themselves in relation to political orientation, but they should also differ depending on the type of news.
broadcasts should be subtitled in English, as has happened with teletext, particularly programs for children, and that the cartoons, which should be used only for educational purposes, for example, depict a historical period like Asterix for example, while currently you leave the field only to Japanese cartoons. The scientific programs should be diversified, and oriented to an audience uneducated and not the most ignorant, because if it is made understandable all, it has already been acquired: it is an unnecessary repetition. I do not understand also why you send so many documentaries on animals, and never for example on plants, agriculture and gardening, or do not disclose the scientific theories of recent Nobel laureates such as Gell Mann. Even if you are transmitting classical music, you must specify the author notes, as subtitles.
I wonder why the lessons of the Consorzio Nettuno is transmitted only at night on RAI-2, not days, and why not deal with scientific issues. The motor activity
temper the body, and it should require one hour of gym a day, chosen by the student.
The school can not be compulsory, either because a requirement for consistency of principle or it is imposed by force, with a strict discipline, behavioral, or do not require this.
punishment inhibit a child. A child does not understand the causes, refuse, and along with them to school. You can not improve their intelligence without an end.
The school, taking up a lot of time for young people, takes a function that is not confined to lessons.
do not agree with the cyclical nature of the programs, because they never get to stop dealing with current topics.
education of a child would be facilitated by attendance at a school where teachers are, or men only or women only.
Culture is transmitted in several ways. Therefore, homework does not produce the same result that could produce even television, participation in extra courses and conferences. If in the evening refresher courses were held, bringing together all the classes into one, more in the classroom, the students behind the other, could accelerate their learning and have the opportunity to choose another teacher with whom to continue the course while maintaining the other subjects, the teachers themselves, though in this case it is necessary for all sections of the same school classes are held in the same field at the same times.
You make too selective as having the opportunity of a place for everyone, but they represent a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless, a waste of time and money. It is important that the study is fueled by direct access to a workplace, which guarantees economic, and be guaranteed a job even if it means having to share equally any minimum employment status. Any attempt to reform the public school is stopped by a confused chorus of protests by students and teachers. While teachers are concerned only to preserve their jobs rather than contribute to the efficiency of the education system, students, however, boycotting classes, why do not you love the school, why do not do any good. That teacher is a category of privileged workers: they not only never go on strike, so do not lose anything of salary, as is the case with all other workers, but for you to take advantage of students scioperino for them, with a force participation and social benefits which are not in any other category. It would be fair that every time there is a student strike, was being considered as a teachers' strike, with its curtailment of salary, as if the teachers were on strike, in order to inhibit this abnormal phenomenon of the student strike, which takes time to study and delays the educational attainment of young people. If young people want to protest and debate about the issues the school must do so in the evening hours of free time. The student protests only serve to provoke more in education spending, to pay for more teachers to increase their number, as if to change the school should just spend more. The school as an organization, however, remains the same. Students strike When, ignoring what he expects will have finished their studies, they are just fools who protest against someone who can not identify.
In school, students must be divided according to different behavioral characteristics, different attitudes, skills'. Keep them all together without distinction can 'only make it more' difficult teaching and learning time delay.
The differentiation of students in classrooms and schools, is to cover all aspects of identity 'and behavior, sex, social class, from bullying to inhibition, and this is not because' it must be provided only to some, considered the most ' the''good''chance 'to attain the highest' high education, judgments that are stupid and useless, but because 'bringing together people with similar characteristics, and' possible deal in a more 'simple and unique for their defect, and in exploiting the advantages. If you put together rather indiscriminately, should be much more 'time and effort to understand and enhance all the qualities' of each. Education must change with the organization of work. The education being made compulsory for all, all can lead to the highest level of studies, but at the same time is divided into many technical guidelines. But how does it shape the student with a specific interest? The school does not really decide which field of study to pursue, and therefore must remain generally the same for everyone, to the extent that is required.
The school is focused on a working occupation, But what happens when jobs are not there? What many students do not even have more reason to study, because they already know that their studies will be useless.
would therefore be useful to associate to study the possibility of a job, right from the start, ensuring that all their jobs. Combining the school, a specific work activity, through a reform of the right to work, it is more productive schooling.
Although the State has provided scholarships for the poor, won the only long after the profit school that is not really recognize all of the study from the same economic opportunities.
now to get a job contests are planned, which instead should be abolished. Being too selective, as it lacks the possibility of a place for everyone, they are already a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless and a waste of time and even money.
that the study should be encouraged, not scholarships, but a job, that is a guarantee economic, social, and not just grades and titles now futile. The qualification must be associated to the workplace, even if it means having to share equally in work hours and income.
who dropped out of school? Those who lack a foundation of economic subsistence.
Students choose an address of studies that give them the chance to get some job in the future, instead of moving towards higher education such as scientific research, for which they do not know if you get a job.
Many students are forced to abandon their studies, or to give them an address less demanding, because they do not receive sufficient financial support from either family, the school must offer the least support, what could be the opportunity to enjoy a meal public, and if he continued his studies with success, even more.
public education is mandatory, as it can not establish an address to the studies, as it is a right for all, must be essential in their subjects and then have only one address, to be only theoretical, scientific and philosophical. It must be added numerous short courses and technical and professional, who can follow the development of the region where you live, and then a concrete future economic gain. The school must therefore be twofold.
The school from my point of view should be open both morning and evening. In fact, I think, in diverse times, that afternoon and evening, you should always keep in classes and rehearsals, because in this way we could follow the same lesson several times, for those who were late, and also because it is accessible to all, and all ages, therefore also for those in employment or deemed too late to start over, because we all have to learn something new, to better address the problem of unemployment. The school must be open to all and at all times, because culture is an important basis for the development of a nation.
The school must also make a selection, which on the basis of the conduct, aspirations, the potential of an individual, must divide the students in schools that follow different speeds. In this way there would be no rivalry between those students who cause a slowdown of teaching. Do not want to listen to the lesson, not wanting to study at home, it slows down and reduces programs to those who wants to study more. So it would be useful questions occur as a university, that is, outside of class hours in order to prevent the listlessness of the student, a phenomenon typical of the school. In this way, and that is bringing together students with the same capacity for learning, leisure students would not be overloaded with homework and further repetition: the school must recognize that life is made of a student's other needs, the school can not or is unable to meet, for which the student must return to the entertainment venues, and if missing, must organize it, otherwise the student will not be able to concentrate on their studies, because the possibility of relaxation is proportional to the possibility of merger.
Women and men are not equal. Women have a different kind of sensitivity and intelligence. The right to equal opportunities for women must be viewed in relation to the duties imposed on men. The student population is equalized, in reality, however, encourages women who have already monopolized the teaching at school and thus have embraced the possibility of academic success (given that academic success is or will become a prerogative of the sons of teachers) ; the male teachers were extinct. So I think they are necessary only schools whose teachers are men. Should also realize that the freedom of teaching, education of a child, can not be entrusted to one person (and autonomy), because there is an increased risk of poor will eventually find. Among the closed walls of a classroom happens that teachers do not teach anything, partly because the students want to study. Education must therefore be controlled not by parents but by a special camera from another room, or two teachers for each subject.
Strikes students highlight the waste of time for young people, public resources, the lack of awareness of students about their future. In public schools the student assemblies should only be permitted at times other than those of courses, or become an excuse for not studying, and already does a bit. The strike is really an excuse with which students (as well as the professors who want to work less and less) reduces the amount imposed on them in the study, and if anyone is able to study more instead, he was invited to give up.
Broadcasting can be a source of information and culture, but you should have different thematic stations with addresses in order to meet the cultural needs of everyone, and especially to get people to cultivate new ones.
The television programming should not adapt to the needs of all viewers to increase listening, but those preferences of viewers more diligent in improving quality.
Lacking quality television exerts a tyranny.
bullying that occur when we meet in front of the TV company, and did not agree on what program to follow, and always wins who wants to see the program less cultural.
There must therefore be a limit to the emergence of new channels, provided they address cultural educational information only.
The television should be repeated periodically in order to be followed at different times, and then by all.
Thus those who stay home because they are unemployed would be able to learn something more than watching television.
TV news should be different: the best choice to differentiate themselves in relation to political orientation, but they should also differ depending on the type of news.
broadcasts should be subtitled in English, as has happened with teletext, particularly programs for children, and that the cartoons, which should be used only for educational purposes, for example, depict a historical period like Asterix for example, while currently you leave the field only to Japanese cartoons. The scientific programs should be diversified, and oriented to an audience uneducated and not the most ignorant, because if it is made understandable all, it has already been acquired: it is an unnecessary repetition. I do not understand also why you send so many documentaries on animals, and never for example on plants, agriculture and gardening, or do not disclose the scientific theories of recent Nobel laureates such as Gell Mann. Even if you are transmitting classical music, you must specify the author notes, as subtitles.
I wonder why the lessons of the Consorzio Nettuno is transmitted only at night on RAI-2, not days, and why not deal with scientific issues. The motor activity
temper the body, and it should require one hour of gym a day, chosen by the student.
The school can not be compulsory, either because a requirement for consistency of principle or it is imposed by force, with a strict discipline, behavioral, or do not require this.
punishment inhibit a child. A child does not understand the causes, refuse, and along with them to school. You can not improve their intelligence without an end.
The school, taking up a lot of time for young people, takes a function that is not confined to lessons.
do not agree with the cyclical nature of the programs, because they never get to stop dealing with current topics.
education of a child would be facilitated by attendance at a school where teachers are, or men only or women only.
Culture is transmitted in several ways. Therefore, homework does not produce the same result that could produce even television, participation in extra courses and conferences. If in the evening refresher courses were held, bringing together all the classes into one, more in the classroom, the students behind the other, could accelerate their learning and have the opportunity to choose another teacher with whom to continue the course while maintaining the other subjects, the teachers themselves, though in this case it is necessary for all sections of the same school classes are held in the same field at the same times.
0 comments:
Post a Comment