Sasusaku Doujinshi Fanfiction

RAILWAYS STATE TAXES



development criteria
The National Railway railway lines should be undertaken following a pattern much more streamlined, while also dealing with urban development, combining for example at railway stations, including the construction of homes, hotels, restaurants, shopping malls, but taking advantage of the height in urban areas, much more than you usually do in Italy, beginning with the urban spaces occupied by the railway premises, and in this so causing a continuous urban housing, and then the transfer of people into new homes, buildings in the highest and most modern cities, as well as the transfer of businesses, who pass along lines of communication easier and therefore faster, would develop further. Economic development is closely associated with the ability of people to congregate in towns production and large, new and advanced. The preservation and recovery of urban centers, especially those defined historical, brake and instead represses technological progress.
You should follow a pattern of rail and road easier, which speeds up the traffic and links. The current plan for developing road and rail, giving priority to the city instead of the roads, which must be linear and independent of the city.
currently connects the city with streets but ever larger, faster rail lines, creating a tangle of streets in an increasingly complex and equally poor, occupying and destroying agricultural land, and then impose the need for city parks instead of exploiting the closeness of the campaign.
The reference you should follow is the 13th meridian, that is, the Rome-Berlin, and the 45th meridian, that is, the Turin-Ferrara, and along a line that runs along the coastline, and thus promote the development of small urban neighborhoods along these roads. The city would be small towns, mainly composed of skyscrapers, and distributed along a linear path.
Urban growth around the old towns, monuments choking in pollution and dirt, building on lands far away, we would live in new buildings with advanced facilities.
E 'essential that railway lines are built lining them with roads, for their maintenance.
Travellers by train must be imposed not to throw anything out of the windows, and to that end, the windows must be blocked, because it is risky to throw an object from a window, or by exposing themselves, either because the slopes of the railway lines are a place where the garbage is added to the abandonment and waste land. In order to prevent the growth of weeds and shrubs, the track should not be flanked by a cliff, but it is made from crushed stone ballast of the track, should be contained within square blocks of rubble in wire mesh. In order
will encourage the exploitation of solar energy, photovoltaic panels cover the trains. Everything should be covered with photovoltaic panels, the buildings, or alternatively, by mirrors.
unemployment would also like to propose to donate to the unemployed, according to the employment services, free tickets, only to be used on trains on which there are vacancies. It 'a waste to have trains running half-empty, especially if at the same time increases the traffic.

ABOUT THE LACK OF INFORMATION AND
'difficult to locate the station in a large poster of the train schedules.
E 'only the immediate vision of electronic scoreboards, but since they do not indicate intermediate stops, you can not help but see also the boards of paper on the bulletin boards that should be hung just below.
should be offered to travelers about the city, at the station. There should be billboards with a topographic map with the list of road, hanging from the board as the train schedule, and buses which can be reached on every single street.
There could be computers that inform travelers about restaurants and hotels of the region, and also the map of the city, the location of each bus (for the urban transport services are not sufficiently clear, and at best, post, at bus stops, topographical plans, showing the bus routes, showing only a very big and indecipherable mess of tracks), the location of such restaurants and hotels, as well as indicate the location of public offices. Even the bus stops, should indicate the location of each bus in a framework of small size (same as on the bus) and a floor plan of the area where you are, and also their paths should not be intricate and incomprehensible, but straight, only pursuant to the north-south or east-west.
travelers, it must be assumed that neighboring communities do not know the city, should be informed of their location, topographical plans by highlighting the development of railway lines, the stops, so that those who must travel to a neighboring town, know right away if you can get there by train, because the timetables are not clear on the routes of trains, merely words such as "Stop at all the stations," without indicating what they are. The traveler does not always know if there is a railway line where they should go in a common interior of the province.

regards hygiene
against the phenomenon of the writings and graffiti on the walls, I would like to propose a solution that seems very simple:
well as leaving the walls with a plaster and rough, which would make it impossible to scroll pens and markers, use a spray paint, the color of the wall to cover and erase any writing with great rapidity. The speed and daily cleaning discourage these acts of vandalism, because they can not stand the test of time, it becomes impossible to leave messages, and do not constitute an example to follow.
I would add that the advertising would cover the graffiti on the cars.
needed toilet closed, but large, portas to bring in a suitcase, and equipped with un'attaccapanni the wall to hang a coat.

Another manifestation of incivility and lack of hygiene in railway stations, is the stray dogs.
should be prevented from asking and give alms in the stations, because this option makes a point of convergence of the poor.
It 's a problem that the FS should at least curb with the right devices.

Repairing Teeth Ideas

to those who pay them and

The poverty contrasts with the work.
What is, therefore, move the money from those who have it to not have it?! For nothing!

Public expenditure rests with state taxes and fees. Far
pay taxes to someone, to a greater extent, just because it is rich, is an injustice, as this may mean stopping businesses to grow further, as could be an impediment to savings: why not instead of wasting save money, to pay more taxes if it is who has the most money?

Being rich does not always mean life of waste, but it can also happen that you are committed to building companies to produce more wealth.

The state should rather be combined taxes and fees in respect of the law, as it is unacceptable that those who violate the law, should be penalized with only a short period in prison, those who today are no more prisons, but places for the psychological well-being. The prison must be an austere place, made of abstinence, penance and work

The progress of a nation is in good citizenship, and all manifestations of incivility should be punished with economic sanctions, which may also consist of work activities.

What Does It Mean When A Man Has Pierced Nipples

URBAN AGRICULTURE EDUCATION EDUCATION




chaos reigns in Italy building, because it promotes urban development in all small towns, rather than just in major cities and along the channels where traffic flows more quickly and simply. What we need to gradually demolish the small towns, turning them into parks. A more aggregated ways forward, both the city as a business. Since you can not stop population growth, requires continuous reorganization and renewal, in order to continually create new spaces. Young people can not live in the city and work in companies that operate according to old patterns, that is, living traditions. In Italy there is a chaotic fragmentation of agricultural property. This fragmentation is the result of agrarian reform took place in the '50s, which aimed to "give the land to cultivate."

currently build in the countryside is only available to farmers. If this limitation wanted to counter the illegal construction, in fact, exploiting the numerous loopholes in the law and the controls, resulted in a development information of the city. In the same way that is chaotic urbanization, to the same extent it is the agricultural use of land and this is not conducive to economic development, which begins with the improvement and development of agriculture.
urban centers, which expand from the agricultural ones, followed by a chaotic order, as is the chaotic way in which land ownership was divided, entrusted to the farmers, but in doing so by blocking its mechanization and industrialization.
The chaotic urbanization of the territory and the chaotic development of farms and causing poor growth, as it does not allow the mechanization and does not allow the development of industry, because - it is necessary to repeat this - the industry's fortunes are the result of a those of agriculture, which is actually the leading sector and fundamental for economic development as agriculture influence, therefore all other sectors, including urban development.
The division of agricultural land in the particles because it is horribly chaotic events following the agricultural use, so we have a large number of land from the more irregular shape, even very small or inaccessible because of internal surface.
Why is it allowed to build in the countryside only to a farmer? Who lives in the country is still a farmer? can not happen that this property is derived from a purchase, or activity conducted by their precessori, but without farmers? Who lives in the country while having the obligation to cultivate the land on which he lives, there are innovative legislation, which always possible to make the marketing of agricultural crops, as well as obliging the owner of land, to cultivate the land on which he lives as a farmer or directly or indirectly, entrusting that task to others, and I refer in particular to workers' organizations managed by public bodies.
In the past, when agriculture was the main productive sector, there arose the problem of unemployment, because agriculture has a production limit, in fact, in the past, farmers were prolific, having many children because it meant having many arms -more work. Agriculture, however, requires mechanization, and an unemployed person must get necessarily employed by an already trained and productive, and have professional training.
Someone will object that there is no need to increase agricultural production. I believe that better organization of the agricultural sector means economic stability and greater certainty for the future, could be reduced when the raw materials from which today has its source industrialization. The problem is not to produce too much, but what is produced, that is to choose food products that are not perishable, so you should try harder to find solutions to transform them and make them last longer. For example, when a few years ago there was overproduction of milk, and throw away, why was not expected to produce more dairy products? because while there is someone who thinks the poor and underdeveloped countries of the Third World are in need of economic aid, but which translate into cancellation of foreign debt. Someone objected


- that if it was easy to build in the country, all you build a house, consuming all the rest with and transforming it into a large suburban.
- that the abandonment of agriculture depends on whether the income is poor and not by the lack of buildings,
- that there are already so many abandoned farm houses or converted houses for Sunday.
I think the land should always be used, in whole and in the best way, so What better way to turn it into a large suburban, rather than allowing it to be eventually built by people who follow a chaotic pattern of development, as is currently the case!

In order to combat the illegal is if anything more right to restrict the possession of more dwellings. To protect the natural environment would be enough free space currently occupied by roads and buildings unnecessary. Living in the countryside should be encouraged, because agriculture is a priority economic sector, especially in regions where unemployment increases.
The state should expropriate property, buy and sell continuously regenerated after the businesses run by people that do not produce enough.
Against excessive urbanization need new rules.
- Building a new house could go at once to the demolition of another building of equal area
- You can not hold more than one house, and over Tot sqm
- Only the state can give in a rental property, "because when no one will rent houses, the building is very demotivating Surplus
- The state plans to build whatever you want and know where to
- on agricultural land can be built only the second rural development-type projects and templates, surrounded only by
agricultural plants and ornamental plants
- The state has ownership of agricultural land and leases only to those who cultivate it, so can prevent you possess wasteland.
- there are too common. It should allow urban development only of the larger cities, and to discourage of all the smaller towns, for example less than 50 thousand inhabitants. The powerful presence of many municipalities, too small, causing a disorderly urbanization as such also causes a massive administrative bureaucracy.
- urbanized land are not only those is built on a house, but even those occupied by roads, pavements of all types, fencing walls. When making the roads, and if they build a lot, never demolish any, the State did not present any problem of urbanization, but they are just roads, streets, pavements incidental to steal as much land for agriculture.
Someone will object that these are rules to be communist state, because it is the state to build or at least to design anything that can be built. There are things that are not individuals but the state to gestiree. If only for a limited period of time, and then resell.
- Why in Italy, if you want to take up less urban space, not built taller?
- Why you want to keep at all costs and to contemplate the historic centers, and live thanks to tourism, instead of a park, and instead contemplate the beauty of modern? All buildings that are longer than 50 years may consider beauty to be preserved forever, so it must not be allowed to rebuild or renovate a building, but you have to build entirely new areas, while those on which there was a building, must be devoted to urban green spaces, parks, because if you have to build something modern, it must be done together with the road network and all other infrastructure.

road and urban development has to follow only the horizontal and vertical directions, compared to the reference meridian of Greenwich and that is parallel north-south and east-west. Even the agricultural land should be split along the same guidelines. Linear and orderly development of the roads would encourage the use of public transport, it would also help the railways to roads, power lines, aqueducts, and it would be even greater relationship with the natural environment. The traffic in this way not only reduce, but would be faster. The territory would be organized and divided into many rectangles of different sizes.
The streets should not be construed as a means to connect the existing cities, When, as they grow, the need for new roads, the road network becomes increasingly more dense and winding. They should be conceived as a means for the rational exploitation of territory, that cities must grow where they have been already made major
links. And if urban development followed the coastline, it would occupy territories that can not be exploited for agricultural purposes and, given the summer exodus to the sea, not only build houses for the winter and others just for the summer, building twice.
This is not to demolish everything that is old, we remember the past, but putting together the ancient and modern too close together, so we have old buildings inevitably overwhelmed by the smoke and dirt, surrounded by pollution because of the roads modern
street signs, trash cans, doodles on the walls, chewing gam-seeded onto every sidewalk, garbage in the streets because they are the center of city life. The contrast that comes from putting together buildings of historical epochs far, only generates disgust. So, in the care of older city centers, it is better to turn them into parks, demolishing buildings that are not part of the same historical period, and transforming the space on which it was demolished in small oases, green car! Closed to traffic, removing public offices and shops, so that no longer represent a "center" of the city, which will converge in the city life.
should have been built along the 45th parallel connecting Turin and Ferrara, along the 9 ° and 12 ° meridian between Rome and Berlin with a road straight and vertical, which makes little to the south along the Tyrrhenian coast south until you arrive in Sicily. In this way we would have some major road routes, with greater speed and simplicity in moving.
Cities should be developed along the major highways and rail links, linearly, rather than causing the continuous construction of new roads and road increasingly labyrinthine tangles, which forces people to use private transport instead of public ones. This would also involve the construction of roads to water systems, where the river channel to to carry water everywhere, to the arid regions, namely in below street, where also add lines for electrical cables, rather than fill the territory of lattice planes.
Making public works as planned, it also means to engage effectively unlimited, the unemployed, why go out and rebuilt gradually over time.

How do you bump up the shade of a house?
In our adversarial political-economic system, which should help in the capitalist accumulation of wealth, who has a lot of money but is more heavily taxed, as if it meant having lots of money to have stolen more. The
buying a property is burdened by taxes, in reality instead of hitting the big real estate as they wish, are recorded on the purchaser, steadily increasing the cost of a house. Among the many other contradictions, there is also the state, while it caused a progressive increase in the value of homes, spend money to build housing, or considers it useful to help those who bought his first house, as if, with these advantages, the value of properties were reduced.
In order to reduce the cost of building, we can simplify the buying and selling of property, removing it to estate agents and centralized in a public office such as the Land Registry, which would also be able to have full information on all properties for sale and under construction.
The design has costs that can be reduced by exploiting both the construction projects already implemented, either by design programmed only by the state. Currently, engineers and architects have earnings too easy.

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
In 1950 it was placed in order to overthrow the landowners, by dividing and distributing agricultural land, as you put the need to entrust the land to those who cultivate it, but in reality even in this over to someone else the agricultural property, and the task of cultivating it, is not a child abandonment. The agricultural property has been abandoned, entrusting it to a series of small owners, analyzed individually are no different from the old landowners. The farmers have abandoned the earth and they are all immigrants. It still allows the sharecropping or lease, that the earth belongs to those who do not cultivate it. The farm property was reduced to only unproductive small family firms. Agricultural land should belong to the State, be compacted, and divided more efficiently, along lines parallel and perpendicular to the reference Grenwich, directions along which all roads should be developed, and under them the underground channels for the distribution of water, electrical cables, and sewage systems. It was thus a vast nationwide network for distribution of river waters, which could arrive at the most arid areas, solving the problem of winter floods of the rivers that drained cederebbero their bed for cultivation purposes. The land can not belong to the State, sold and rented to farmers, until they have a benefit that is optimal management. In this way, farmers would not pay taxes in addition to affittto land. The State must not abandon to their own farmers, but to establish the direction of production of each plot, and then arrange for processing and sale of agricultural products. The economic development of a nation begins for agriculture, when in fact it is in excess, is a clear symptom of the inability and incapacity economic expansion, the solution is in increasing exports, although in poor countries, giving food, rather than write off debts (resulting from erroneous charges, such as military). The debts should never be canceled, because the underdeveloped countries have no right to political independence from richer nations. Only a state of economic and political dependence, can guarantee the preservation of peace is not eligible for a state of total autonomy. Freedom has its limits. All
sloping ground, so for example, along the mountain slopes along the sides of highways, railways or rivers, should not be abandoned lands, and then filled with weeds and garbage that will never be recovered, but should be implemented in steps, so that they can be viable, or even cultivated. The steps must be carried out preferably used because of rectangular wire mesh and irregular stone, in order to allow for the flow of water. An example of how it should be more fully exploited the land, are the rice terraces in the Chinese province of Yunnan. There should be a single square meter of land abandoned, occupied by weeds, trash, or used inappropriately. Rather than addressing the degreening of the Amazon, desertification in Africa, we do not think the way in which our region is exploited.
Squares, urban roads, you should plant trees. It dotrebbero grow useful plants, herbs or medicines, fruit trees such as chestnuts, walnuts, and even in pots, instead of so many stupid and monuments and fountains.
The streets are contaminated by bad behavior like throwing the filters of cigarettes, chewing gum, and all that is found to be thrown away without being able to have a litter box. I think people need to be educated to the care of public health, and ordered to clean up the streets.

What Color Shirt To Wear With Black Pants

The school serves the attainment of a qualification, which in turn should serve to a job, but how to determine what to study? what will your future if educational level is not expected immediately resulting in a job? Currently, the certainty with which to continue their studies can only belong to those who knows to have a recommendation, and then what is or may be, or become, if a nursery school for future recommendations? In other words it is not to improve but to maintain a social status, unless there is a continued immigration of aliens ready to take the places worst social.

The question is whether it is lawful to the phenomenon of the recommendation. The recommendation is the way in which it retains a social status. A father to his son the social opportunities of which he himself enjoyed. But who else but a father to a boy can transfer their experience and culture, rather than relying all'incuria of a public school, which sooner or later he will leave himself?!
Everyone from kids, have a lot of potential that we no longer have as adults, and should take advantage from an early age, and this is possible only are we educated and trained in the family already. and how to determine which field of study a student must choose, in order to avoid confusion, loss of time and drop-out?

If many young people drop out of school, this does not depend on a lower capacity, but the privileges achieved by some, which may lead others to choose a subordinate role in society, so that you experience many ingisutizie hidden in order to kick away people in need of a recommendation.

compulsory education must continue until the acquisition of the ability to read and write, or it must be associated with a job?
If you want the opportunity to continue studies beyond the minimum, you should combine the qualifications for a job so that you do not waste time in a state of unemployment, but then take over another type of selection made of the most difficult and promotions failures easier.

currently use are expected to get a special announcement, that should be abolished.
You make too selective as having the opportunity of a place for everyone, but they represent a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless, a waste of time and money. It is important that the study is fueled by direct access to a workplace, which guarantees economic, and be guaranteed a job even if it means having to share equally any minimum employment status. Any attempt to reform the public school is stopped by a confused chorus of protests by students and teachers. While teachers are concerned only to preserve their jobs rather than contribute to the efficiency of the education system, students, however, boycotting classes, why do not you love the school, why do not do any good. That teacher is a category of privileged workers: they not only never go on strike, so do not lose anything of salary, as is the case with all other workers, but for you to take advantage of students scioperino for them, with a force participation and social benefits which are not in any other category. It would be fair that every time there is a student strike, was being considered as a teachers' strike, with its curtailment of salary, as if the teachers were on strike, in order to inhibit this abnormal phenomenon of the student strike, which takes time to study and delays the educational attainment of young people. If young people want to protest and debate about the issues the school must do so in the evening hours of free time. The student protests only serve to provoke more in education spending, to pay for more teachers to increase their number, as if to change the school should just spend more. The school as an organization, however, remains the same. Students strike When, ignoring what he expects will have finished their studies, they are just fools who protest against someone who can not identify.
In school, students must be divided according to different behavioral characteristics, different attitudes, skills'. Keep them all together without distinction can 'only make it more' difficult teaching and learning time delay.
The differentiation of students in classrooms and schools, is to cover all aspects of identity 'and behavior, sex, social class, from bullying to inhibition, and this is not because' it must be provided only to some, considered the most ' the''good''chance 'to attain the highest' high education, judgments that are stupid and useless, but because 'bringing together people with similar characteristics, and' possible deal in a more 'simple and unique for their defect, and in exploiting the advantages. If you put together rather indiscriminately, should be much more 'time and effort to understand and enhance all the qualities' of each. Education must change with the organization of work. The education being made compulsory for all, all can lead to the highest level of studies, but at the same time is divided into many technical guidelines. But how does it shape the student with a specific interest? The school does not really decide which field of study to pursue, and therefore must remain generally the same for everyone, to the extent that is required.

The school is focused on a working occupation, But what happens when jobs are not there? What many students do not even have more reason to study, because they already know that their studies will be useless.
would therefore be useful to associate to study the possibility of a job, right from the start, ensuring that all their jobs. Combining the school, a specific work activity, through a reform of the right to work, it is more productive schooling.
Although the State has provided scholarships for the poor, won the only long after the profit school that is not really recognize all of the study from the same economic opportunities.
now to get a job contests are planned, which instead should be abolished. Being too selective, as it lacks the possibility of a place for everyone, they are already a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless and a waste of time and even money.
that the study should be encouraged, not scholarships, but a job, that is a guarantee economic, social, and not just grades and titles now futile. The qualification must be associated to the workplace, even if it means having to share equally in work hours and income.
who dropped out of school? Those who lack a foundation of economic subsistence.
Students choose an address of studies that give them the chance to get some job in the future, instead of moving towards higher education such as scientific research, for which they do not know if you get a job.
Many students are forced to abandon their studies, or to give them an address less demanding, because they do not receive sufficient financial support from either family, the school must offer the least support, what could be the opportunity to enjoy a meal public, and if he continued his studies with success, even more.
public education is mandatory, as it can not establish an address to the studies, as it is a right for all, must be essential in their subjects and then have only one address, to be only theoretical, scientific and philosophical. It must be added numerous short courses and technical and professional, who can follow the development of the region where you live, and then a concrete future economic gain. The school must therefore be twofold.

The school from my point of view should be open both morning and evening. In fact, I think, in diverse times, that afternoon and evening, you should always keep in classes and rehearsals, because in this way we could follow the same lesson several times, for those who were late, and also because it is accessible to all, and all ages, therefore also for those in employment or deemed too late to start over, because we all have to learn something new, to better address the problem of unemployment. The school must be open to all and at all times, because culture is an important basis for the development of a nation.

The school must also make a selection, which on the basis of the conduct, aspirations, the potential of an individual, must divide the students in schools that follow different speeds. In this way there would be no rivalry between those students who cause a slowdown of teaching. Do not want to listen to the lesson, not wanting to study at home, it slows down and reduces programs to those who wants to study more. So it would be useful questions occur as a university, that is, outside of class hours in order to prevent the listlessness of the student, a phenomenon typical of the school. In this way, and that is bringing together students with the same capacity for learning, leisure students would not be overloaded with homework and further repetition: the school must recognize that life is made of a student's other needs, the school can not or is unable to meet, for which the student must return to the entertainment venues, and if missing, must organize it, otherwise the student will not be able to concentrate on their studies, because the possibility of relaxation is proportional to the possibility of merger.

Women and men are not equal. Women have a different kind of sensitivity and intelligence. The right to equal opportunities for women must be viewed in relation to the duties imposed on men. The student population is equalized, in reality, however, encourages women who have already monopolized the teaching at school and thus have embraced the possibility of academic success (given that academic success is or will become a prerogative of the sons of teachers) ; the male teachers were extinct. So I think they are necessary only schools whose teachers are men. Should also realize that the freedom of teaching, education of a child, can not be entrusted to one person (and autonomy), because there is an increased risk of poor will eventually find. Among the closed walls of a classroom happens that teachers do not teach anything, partly because the students want to study. Education must therefore be controlled not by parents but by a special camera from another room, or two teachers for each subject.

Strikes students highlight the waste of time for young people, public resources, the lack of awareness of students about their future. In public schools the student assemblies should only be permitted at times other than those of courses, or become an excuse for not studying, and already does a bit. The strike is really an excuse with which students (as well as the professors who want to work less and less) reduces the amount imposed on them in the study, and if anyone is able to study more instead, he was invited to give up.

Broadcasting can be a source of information and culture, but you should have different thematic stations with addresses in order to meet the cultural needs of everyone, and especially to get people to cultivate new ones.
The television programming should not adapt to the needs of all viewers to increase listening, but those preferences of viewers more diligent in improving quality.
Lacking quality television exerts a tyranny.
bullying that occur when we meet in front of the TV company, and did not agree on what program to follow, and always wins who wants to see the program less cultural.
There must therefore be a limit to the emergence of new channels, provided they address cultural educational information only.
The television should be repeated periodically in order to be followed at different times, and then by all.
Thus those who stay home because they are unemployed would be able to learn something more than watching television.
TV news should be different: the best choice to differentiate themselves in relation to political orientation, but they should also differ depending on the type of news.
broadcasts should be subtitled in English, as has happened with teletext, particularly programs for children, and that the cartoons, which should be used only for educational purposes, for example, depict a historical period like Asterix for example, while currently you leave the field only to Japanese cartoons. The scientific programs should be diversified, and oriented to an audience uneducated and not the most ignorant, because if it is made understandable all, it has already been acquired: it is an unnecessary repetition. I do not understand also why you send so many documentaries on animals, and never for example on plants, agriculture and gardening, or do not disclose the scientific theories of recent Nobel laureates such as Gell Mann. Even if you are transmitting classical music, you must specify the author notes, as subtitles.
I wonder why the lessons of the Consorzio Nettuno is transmitted only at night on RAI-2, not days, and why not deal with scientific issues. The motor activity
temper the body, and it should require one hour of gym a day, chosen by the student.
The school can not be compulsory, either because a requirement for consistency of principle or it is imposed by force, with a strict discipline, behavioral, or do not require this.
punishment inhibit a child. A child does not understand the causes, refuse, and along with them to school. You can not improve their intelligence without an end.
The school, taking up a lot of time for young people, takes a function that is not confined to lessons.
do not agree with the cyclical nature of the programs, because they never get to stop dealing with current topics.
education of a child would be facilitated by attendance at a school where teachers are, or men only or women only.
Culture is transmitted in several ways. Therefore, homework does not produce the same result that could produce even television, participation in extra courses and conferences. If in the evening refresher courses were held, bringing together all the classes into one, more in the classroom, the students behind the other, could accelerate their learning and have the opportunity to choose another teacher with whom to continue the course while maintaining the other subjects, the teachers themselves, though in this case it is necessary for all sections of the same school classes are held in the same field at the same times.

How To Write A Donation Request Letter

UNEMPLOYMENT



E 'can permanently eradicate the problem of unemployment?

Without taking into account the policy guidelines of a nation, it is certainly useful to follow the virtuous principles, such as economic growth program that is far-sighted thinking about the future. Our sense of economic insecurity depends dall'accorgersi have a disastrous future, so we need to produce and accumulate assets that will remain useful over time and are durable, with the aim of preventing the possible times of crisis. Our economy has ups and downs because it is not foresight. To do so I would take as a model to imitate the ants, which, so as well as bees, are hard-working just because they work for the future, gathering food, and just have that quality of intelligence that a man seems to be missing, in addition to a rational population control. Unemployment can be counteracted by producing and accumulating indefinitely. The question is what is needed and durable, that is, a careful analysis should be relevant to activities that engage, which also takes into account the achieved scientific discoveries and potential.

unemployment is not just more education, culture, professional experience. Who has time, money, and enough patience and selflessness to disseminate and acquire them? In the world there are billions of people and you can not educate everyone. It should be an asset rather easy to learn, that people need to work in agriculture. Agriculture is the only sector that can provide jobs for all, why do not claim the technical expertise which claims instead the industry with its temporary jobs. Agriculture does not necessarily require a university degree and can absorb many unemployed, and consequently many others would have easier opportunities in industry and in the studies, because you can not raise the average level of culture, without first reducing the problem of unemployment that induces many children leave school or choose to address increasingly shorter and occupational rather than more scientific.

In the globalized economic system, poverty, coming from Africa, knocking on our doors, sooner or later sfonderà.
Agriculture can deal effectively with unemployment because they can grow anywhere, that is also in the southern regions from which people emigrated, but requires organization. Agriculture is neglected, because it makes no sense to produce more, but the state could buy what a farmer produces, in order to guarantee a stable income, while requiring the production of preferred products, which can easily sell abroad in countries who suffer from hunger (possibly in exchange for greater military control, because where there is too much population growth there is a greater need for public policy, and a potential outbreak of armed conflict), or produce what you can save and accumulate through the opportunities offered by the science of conservation or who have a higher nutritional value. If you want an economic system based on freedom and the market can not be prevented migration from poor to rich ones weights, and then you have to find solutions to facilitate these movements without creating chaos, preparing to welcome them, perhaps involving an exchange of people (not a bad idea to share with the younger offenders).

Farmers are impaired as people left to themselves, disappointed by their lack of income, so leave the business, attracted by the fixed income of those working in industry or otherwise employed by a pimp or a company, a individual farmer does not always have the ability to form, when it should be a more direct link-state worker. Agriculture
you live in a healthy environment, in contact with nature, but those who live in the country flees, because it remains isolated from the city. This problem is caused by a chaotic road planning, which allows quick and easy transport. I believe that all roads should be constructed following the only the north-south or east-west, ie in the direction of the meridians and parallels of Greenwich. This type of organization
road would also give the farmland development constantly rectangular, easy to manage.


In order to promote industrial growth and per capita wealth is just produce as much as possible, but in order to accumulate and not for the purpose of consuming as much as possible. The current economic system "consumed" is causing a rapid consumption of natural resources such as oil, from which came the industrialization, initially originated from coal, and that has changed our lifestyle so drastically that we have a cognition now very little of rural economy. Nothing will not remain well-being we enjoy. The current economic system, which has had frequent periods of crisis due to a lack of visionary programmatic Involver in a massacre if the science and technology do not introduce alternative sources of energy to replace oil.

Examining the current political and economic system, I would note that in 1929, when there was the severe economic crisis in the U.S., called "Great Depression" has never been resolved, but only temporarily postponed to the future. Why does it happen? The American economy is founded on trade, and if a nation is isolated, not able to accumulate resources, that falls into a state of economic uncertainty. A political system can only be closed economic community, that in it the economic output must be established and collected by the State, only to later be distributed or accumulated, and the Russian Revolution of 1917 created a communist system, as well as the fascist regimes and a Nazi, which is also based on similar principles, even if made more confused by the influence American liberal, so it was nationalist and xenophobic political system, which reduced trade. The United States in '29 with Roosevelt were forced to adopt a nationalist policy similar to that implemented in Russia, made up of large public works projects to occupy the number of unemployed and the establishment of social services and assistance, that the New Deal, and this is communism. Communism would spread throughout Europe and the world, if it was not initially limited by the formation of military regimes ideologically confused as Nazism and fascism, but won in the Second World War. Communism, which is derived from the collapse of the monarchy, is an essential character of the res-publica, and can be extinguished only by restoring the monarchy, whose social model has never really extinguished, that is our social and political ideas then can only be a middle ground.
Both the victory of World War II in '45, both from Since 1930 the discoveries of science and technology, enabling greater industrialization, relying heavily on oil, allow the U.S. to prevail in the world, for which he stood that liberal economic system that had characterized the formation, based on trade and free competition, but in reality only aims to converge all the primary resources in North America, developing the industry where it is more developed, making it rich and thriving industrialization where there is already, not allowing the development of underdeveloped areas, that will always remain underdeveloped, and forced to get rid of all the raw materials available to them, and when they will no longer even, if not return a new "Great Depression" many people will be killed, since this is useless people, no culture, professional experience in order to be absorbed by various industries according to their temporary labor needs, but instead, just because can not do anything and can not learn anything, could instead be used in agricultural activities. Freedom is a different way to eliminate too many people, not with the death penalty or in concentration camps, but with a different expertise, so that while a drug addict in a despotic state is locked up in prison but forced to detoxify, in a democratic nation of sensitive, caring people like ours, but it is left free and encouraged to continue doing so until he committed suicide.
Our political system is that economic falsely caring and sensitive to human rights, because in reality imposes misery to the poor through a system competition based on free competition, actually rigged from the start. The capitalist system is not a production system that is capable of providing for the needs of all flights, and even their own future, that is incapable of preventing sudden periods of crisis. The economic law is founded on a market economy and that is that the supply must equal demand, it is a silly rule that looks only needs of this without much foresight. There is a proverb that says local farmers Puglia "collect water when it rains," that you can not restrict the production and therefore the presence of a supply and demand in a market with intense trading activity. China, with the recent participation in the global market, thanks to its state capitalism, has an ideal production system, and will become a development model for all nations. The Great American Depression is a problem remained unsolved, because all the peoples of the South of the world live and have always lived, and also shows an increasingly worrying phenomenon: that of unemployment, however, in my opinion is perfectly explained and its solution in agriculture and production of essential goods and durable and works for the same. Agriculture is the only sector that can absorb more labor and is not intended as unlimited as is the culture or experience of the various factories. To eradicate poverty are not enough skills, culture and experiences. And who has time, money, and enough patience and altruism to spread? In the world there are too many people and you can not educate everyone. It should rather make the people work in agriculture. Agriculture is the only sector that can provide jobs for all, because culture is not necessary, nor all those many experiences that provisional claims industry.

PRODUCE AND EARNING PROFITS AND DURABLE GOODS

The State should encourage the development of businesses with this goal, tackle unemployment by requiring everyone to work without worrying if there is overproduction by following the economy stupid laws market, in fact, aiming precisely sovrapprodurre, as long as they produce useful goods and durable (I make an example that seems trivial to cultivate cereals and pulses, which are more durable agricultural products). The farms must be maximally productive, bearing in mind that the reorganization should be continuous, and have as their model of development companies more productive. L 'agriculture the leading sector, and basic economic development, and that it also follows the development of urban and industrial. It requires a continuous re-organization and mechanization and the people will flee just because it does not.

In the past, when agriculture was the main productive sector, there arose the problem of unemployment, they have not put limits productivity, and in fact the peasants were the most prolific, having many children because they did not mean to have unemployed workers in the future but rather more.
In order to achieve greater agricultural development must be rationalized systems of production, harvesting and distribution, expanding markets accelerating traffic to export more and more away, turn food into products more durable. The wealth of a nation increases with trade and exports, but when this is not possible, you have to produce essential materials and durable goods, so the example I used to grow cereals and pulses. It should produce as much as possible, even when you can not sell anything, as long as it is of essential goods, which do not expire after a short time for it to be a certainty for the economic future. You can not leave a vacant lot, or a spare machine in a factory, as you can not leave many unemployed young people, at the height of their physical vigor. And so as you can not allocate land to a few specific crops because they become unproductive, so a worker can not be used for a few specific tasks, because it becomes unproductive as a car now technologically outdated. In Puglia, the management of the land or is entrusted to families who work and live in the countryside. It seems to me unavoidable that we must also live in the country, but I think that would rely on more productive land to very large farms, and housing in rural areas are assigned to seasonal workers. The current unlimited division of the land, has fueled a construction chaos that makes it impossible to extend the use of mechanized earth, reducing productivity. Even as the crops farm, I think that we should prefer the cultivation of the most useful and productive and to avoid monocultures, as the olive and the vine, preferring to seasonal crops, allowing for a renewal of the land in agricultural use, as well as a greatest possible genetic improvement plants. In our capitalist economic system companies are developing thanks to the "consumerism", that is to produce and earn more, also cause people to waste, that is, do not hesitate to take full advantage of all available natural resources, nor without worrying of all nor of the future. In our economic system, the state should promote a smooth and orderly development of enterprises. If people move too much to work it is clear that there is no organization. To tackle unemployment, we need a more uniform and equitable distribution of production sources throughout. In a free market system, companies are formed and instead develop in a variety of locations, so you move too much to go to work, and then if you have to work for limited periods of time, such a chaotic distribution of opportunities work leads to the recruitment of immigrants who are on-site, perhaps even illegally, they become immediately available, perhaps with lower wages and unregulated trade union. To fight unemployment, it is necessary to grow the business through a restructuring and re-organization. So as you can not build a new building without demolishing the old one, so you can not build new businesses, without redoing the existing ones. Companies are reconstructed through a process of nationalization and privatization made alternately, using more frequently when expropriation is possible to produce more. I think it important that businesses are aggregated in order to enlarge, and if they are not able to be expropriated, because if a firm s'ingrandisce loses competitiveness. Privatize state-owned but then again, is a strategy which bring it back to productivity, to be managed by those who have greater opportunities to those who can introduce innovation. Unemployment, school is the first company from which to begin the career of a man, and should lead to a job. Each title in school curriculum should be the same as a work activity, and if you do not want that everyone has a job they would like enough that the study school, especially science, would be rewarded, even with the simplest incentive economic, that is a meal in a school canteen. Science is important for technological progress and economic development of a nation and if the study is not premitato, no one will engage in producing scientific knowledge. Unemployment must be separated the reason why the work you are paid, that you should not precede the money to ideals, but you have to work and produce even if the market does not buy what is produced, provided that it is essential, useful and durable. If the market undervalues \u200b\u200band does not buy what we produce, not to say that the production must be stopped. Who reads what I write, for example, will say that is worth nothing: it is a reason why it should no longer write?!
have hobbies and cultivate them, until they become potential sources of income, because you can learn something through a wider dissemination of traditional culture, helping to prevent and defend against a likely condition of future unemployment.

control immigration
If an immigrant can enter, they immediately get another thousand. There are many others waiting. It 'an unstoppable flow and progressive, taking advantage of liberal economic laws of market economy, but it undermines, declaring the victory of communism. A state has its own territorial limits and must organize their productive resources in proportion to the territory at its disposal, ensuring an equitable distribution of businesses in the area, why should not there be even migratory movements within the same nation. Excessive movement of migration is the result of an organized chaos of a democratic political system, in which freedom comes from having open borders, so anyone can enter or leave the state. Immigrants should instead return them to where they are and create jobs there. The Italians did not work but should instead be favored in the movements in the area, with free transport and accommodation. Immigration must oppose banning the recruitment of foreign labor even at the cost to derail a business. If it appears that immigrants are more willing to play the Italians the toughest jobs, you're wrong. An immigrant is not exploited, but it enjoys the same opportunities for all. In our culture there is slavery. If it is true that there are more heavy work and humble, if anything, they should be imposed on prisoners, since the prisons seem to have become centers for the psycho-physical, and that many offenders live in freedom because the prisons are too expensive to build new ones. Italians do not carry out certain tasks, considered heavy, just because in the chaotic organization of the work of our economic system, are forced to move too, that the error is in the fact that companies, in a free market system, are formed and develop in ways and places as varied and you move too much to go to work, to work for limited periods of time, and a chaotic distribution of job opportunities, leads to the recruitment of people lying on the spot, maybe even illegally, it is immediately available, perhaps with lower wages and unregulated trade union. If it is true that foreigners are fleeing despotic regimes, it is true, if anything, that evil must be resolved at the origin in their countries of origin, with a greater international military control, aimed at peace. If you really want to allow immigration, foreigners, if anything, should first fulfill the obligation of military service, as it was imposed a few years ago to all young Italians, and then be used in the military forces necessary to ensure peace world and even in their own countries. Proliferate despotic regimes abroad, as well as governments ignoring the well-being economic of the people, but especially neglect. In Africa, people are reproducing like rabbits, when they play should be especially rationed. Immigration is the result of economic growth disorganized, who can not be homogeneous but concentrated in some regions, and must oppose banning the recruitment of foreign labor even if it meant to derail the company but at the same time creating new firms in poor regions, from which the immigrants come from. The uncertainty for the future following the opening of the borders of a democratic political system, resulting in unlimited potential immigration, leads Italians to aspire to positions of employment as stable as possible. The Italians are no longer willing to carry out certain activities, just because in the chaotic organization of the work increases more and more, are forced to move too, that the error is in the fact that companies, in a free market system, are formed and develop in ways and places as varied and you move too much to go to work, to work for limited periods of time.

Set priorities' PRODUCTION

giving priority to agriculture, then put in second place less emphasis on industry and service sector trade, which should involve itself more women, and the tourism and crafts which should occupy the elderly, but avoiding to leave the world unchanged by time, locked in a picturesque location of other times only for a contemplative end tourism. The nostalgia of the past due to retrogression.

new labor contracts

ABOLISHED CONTESTS competitions should reward those who are eligible. All competitors have an equal right to a place and therefore the period of work performance should be divided equally among the eligible, through innovative employment contracts, or contracts or fixed-term employment and which is of indefinite duration, slopes down towards the part-time, or may be transferable to other, which would make the statutory recommendation. In reality competitions should be abolished altogether because it is not permissible for the State to study the youth in public school, and then leave them with a title that they do not have to get a job directly, forcing them to investigate further during the competitions, forgetting that this also implies economic costs, a waste of time and energy. The employee should be then divided among all persons on, and if it causes economic hardship, each one can integrate it with other secondary activities, it must not be prevented from conducting a second job. There must be workers with more rights than others, but the unemployment must be equal share to all. Deploy multiple equally and to all employment opportunities, through increased fragmentation and distribution activities which do not require experience. Dismiss should not be construed as punishment. No one should be unemployed, but you only need to reduce waste and excess, allowing and encouraging other activities that they can play simultaneously, working to meet the personal aspirations. The companies themselves may organize other activities to do in your spare time, with training and education and services for which incoragggiare workers spend or should spend their free time.

INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY '
with hours of work vary. Why would a company be more productive, you can turnificare working hours, so you can work at night, as this would occur more quickly. In this way, you could also use many times the DST, ie the people verrbbe induced to get up at dawn, wasting less electricity.

MAKING THE HEAVY WORK LESS
Today increase retirees, but also the retirement age. Young people are studying or unemployed, child labor is banned, women do office tasks, but then who is really working? who is available to conduct activities heavier? Instead of asking how to work more all, we must ask ourselves how to make the work less stressful. For example, young people, including children, especially when school is not productive, they may accompany their parents on farms, which then could take place gradually and replace them regularly, as if the place was for one person, but in reality played by several people the same. And also can be associated with work and study, work and leisure, as many like to travel abroad, you could organize the foreign work, including for the purpose of being able to learn as English. In a society where all have fled from their duty to work, it is useful to propose voluntary activities. As gets to love a job that nullifies our expectations, which is not compatible with our attitudes, which deprives our energies and our time? Reducing working hours. To love your work must also live in perfect harmony with their colleagues, because the job is almost always a team effort. It should then work with a group of people that you are equals, in order to work in perfect harmony, a spirit of cooperation, united by a spirit of friendship and understanding, which, for example, to that end, the phenomenon of recommendation acquires a valid reason, since there through the recommendation of friends and family around you, that is, people with whom you can work better and more. The recommendation is a more complex problem, however, that there can be no right and wrong. In order to give continuity to its work, because you can not live forever, you also need to find someone else to give it away, able to replace them.
WITH INCENTIVES Why not make the job even with the privileges, because it makes no sense for an employee to work more, while being paid more, if that does not allow him to satisfy the ambitions and other work attitudes. In 700, during the regime of absolute monarchy in France, the function of money was minimal. He was required to contribute to the construction of public works and the activities of agricultural estates. Because of course everyone was trying to escape, they thought the money as an incentive, since the money could now be done with simple paper. As was also collected, through taxes, to the people themselves, this system not only increases productivity, but also changed the political system, as it also caused the fall of the privileges of those who, like the aristocracy, the people abused, drawing too easily public resources of the Treasury. The people who were not prepared to allow the money raised through taxes would be spent on supporting the petty vices of the aristocracy, took the opportunity to lead a revolution.
with greater transparency, information and participation in work organization. Dedication to work is reduced when the workers are involved in activities that do not know the purpose and usefulness, which is programmed without being informed about the objectives to be achieved. The relationship between politicians and people must be increased and continuous, so that the people be informed and then given a share of what is being carried out. To this end, it should be disseminated through radio and TV political debates, on an ongoing basis, both local and national, and to this end I would like to highlight as the best example of the popular Radical Radio.

Save time and avoid unnecessary waste.
There are many ways to avoid wasting time. One of these is the possibility to do it more quickly if the management of production activities is well organized, and also can do multiple tasks simultaneously, even integrating them. Idleness should not be interpreted as not wanting to do anything, but as you can not do what you want. In order to reduce waste and time, an idea would be to pay for the work not only with money but also with cheap goods and services: why, for example, cause a loss of time searching the house, when I can find the company or cause a loss of time for cooking at home, when you can arrange a meal in a canteen public company, and so street, organizing common form in those activities that a worker brings in private, in order to make them immediately accessible. If it is true that salaries are losing value, it is also true that after having increased, the government takes everything simply by increasing taxes or government spending, so the strike is an instrument of protest useless, a waste of time, which reduces productivity . Workers should rather impose a reduction of the salaries of executives, as this only leads to a reduction in labor costs and inflation. Workers are bullies as their manager, as demonstrated by the "bullying" or "hazing", as they are in fact deeply selfish: the action of trade unions does not care because of who is unemployed, suggesting an increase in labor costs and thus inflation. The labor problem is also the result of family crisis so we need to experiment with different models of cohabitation by her family, because when you form a company, should be taken with a lot of people bound together by feelings of friendship also. Make possible opportunities for co-existence and cohabitation, far from family, would allow companies to meet the workforce of workers living in different cities, as they must also provide an opportunity for community meals and lodging. The immigrants, instead of having to live among the waste because they save, should be housed in shelters, and proposed, serving local businesses. Having to spend money to have to live in rent in a distant city, it can make inconvenient to take advantage of a job, and in effect encouraged the immigration of people of all backgrounds, so willing to work at any cost, whereas the development of companies should promote the acquisition of local labor, and the only way you can solve the problem of unemployment. The unemployment problem will never be solved if you allow too many migratory movements, because the problems of economic organization are also associated with those of political organization: it can migrate be (a tool) synonymous with military occupation. What job will our unemployed young people, if they see that the job that it was for them, is occupied by an alien?

population control
The organization of economic resources to provide programming and also population growth. One can not avoid the necessity of reproduction, and you wonder how you can reduce the population growth, without reducing the overall working capacity of a population. While in the past caused some wars, which were used to reduce the population, to allow a revival after a large thinning. And now what happens instead? In any political system, even ours, there is a different method to eliminate people. In the Nazi system, as in Stalin's communist system, selection of species was organized by the State, through the imposition of the death camps, and further biological man would have been entrusted to the bio-computer engineering. In our capitalist system, criminals are left free, so for example a murderess can only be considered a mental patient in need of care. The relentless and continuous flow of immigrants, which characterizes our liberal economic system, causing economic uncertainty, also results in a lower population growth, so paradoxically, the rich countries are also less prolific.