What Does It Mean When A Man Has Pierced Nipples

URBAN AGRICULTURE EDUCATION EDUCATION




chaos reigns in Italy building, because it promotes urban development in all small towns, rather than just in major cities and along the channels where traffic flows more quickly and simply. What we need to gradually demolish the small towns, turning them into parks. A more aggregated ways forward, both the city as a business. Since you can not stop population growth, requires continuous reorganization and renewal, in order to continually create new spaces. Young people can not live in the city and work in companies that operate according to old patterns, that is, living traditions. In Italy there is a chaotic fragmentation of agricultural property. This fragmentation is the result of agrarian reform took place in the '50s, which aimed to "give the land to cultivate."

currently build in the countryside is only available to farmers. If this limitation wanted to counter the illegal construction, in fact, exploiting the numerous loopholes in the law and the controls, resulted in a development information of the city. In the same way that is chaotic urbanization, to the same extent it is the agricultural use of land and this is not conducive to economic development, which begins with the improvement and development of agriculture.
urban centers, which expand from the agricultural ones, followed by a chaotic order, as is the chaotic way in which land ownership was divided, entrusted to the farmers, but in doing so by blocking its mechanization and industrialization.
The chaotic urbanization of the territory and the chaotic development of farms and causing poor growth, as it does not allow the mechanization and does not allow the development of industry, because - it is necessary to repeat this - the industry's fortunes are the result of a those of agriculture, which is actually the leading sector and fundamental for economic development as agriculture influence, therefore all other sectors, including urban development.
The division of agricultural land in the particles because it is horribly chaotic events following the agricultural use, so we have a large number of land from the more irregular shape, even very small or inaccessible because of internal surface.
Why is it allowed to build in the countryside only to a farmer? Who lives in the country is still a farmer? can not happen that this property is derived from a purchase, or activity conducted by their precessori, but without farmers? Who lives in the country while having the obligation to cultivate the land on which he lives, there are innovative legislation, which always possible to make the marketing of agricultural crops, as well as obliging the owner of land, to cultivate the land on which he lives as a farmer or directly or indirectly, entrusting that task to others, and I refer in particular to workers' organizations managed by public bodies.
In the past, when agriculture was the main productive sector, there arose the problem of unemployment, because agriculture has a production limit, in fact, in the past, farmers were prolific, having many children because it meant having many arms -more work. Agriculture, however, requires mechanization, and an unemployed person must get necessarily employed by an already trained and productive, and have professional training.
Someone will object that there is no need to increase agricultural production. I believe that better organization of the agricultural sector means economic stability and greater certainty for the future, could be reduced when the raw materials from which today has its source industrialization. The problem is not to produce too much, but what is produced, that is to choose food products that are not perishable, so you should try harder to find solutions to transform them and make them last longer. For example, when a few years ago there was overproduction of milk, and throw away, why was not expected to produce more dairy products? because while there is someone who thinks the poor and underdeveloped countries of the Third World are in need of economic aid, but which translate into cancellation of foreign debt. Someone objected


- that if it was easy to build in the country, all you build a house, consuming all the rest with and transforming it into a large suburban.
- that the abandonment of agriculture depends on whether the income is poor and not by the lack of buildings,
- that there are already so many abandoned farm houses or converted houses for Sunday.
I think the land should always be used, in whole and in the best way, so What better way to turn it into a large suburban, rather than allowing it to be eventually built by people who follow a chaotic pattern of development, as is currently the case!

In order to combat the illegal is if anything more right to restrict the possession of more dwellings. To protect the natural environment would be enough free space currently occupied by roads and buildings unnecessary. Living in the countryside should be encouraged, because agriculture is a priority economic sector, especially in regions where unemployment increases.
The state should expropriate property, buy and sell continuously regenerated after the businesses run by people that do not produce enough.
Against excessive urbanization need new rules.
- Building a new house could go at once to the demolition of another building of equal area
- You can not hold more than one house, and over Tot sqm
- Only the state can give in a rental property, "because when no one will rent houses, the building is very demotivating Surplus
- The state plans to build whatever you want and know where to
- on agricultural land can be built only the second rural development-type projects and templates, surrounded only by
agricultural plants and ornamental plants
- The state has ownership of agricultural land and leases only to those who cultivate it, so can prevent you possess wasteland.
- there are too common. It should allow urban development only of the larger cities, and to discourage of all the smaller towns, for example less than 50 thousand inhabitants. The powerful presence of many municipalities, too small, causing a disorderly urbanization as such also causes a massive administrative bureaucracy.
- urbanized land are not only those is built on a house, but even those occupied by roads, pavements of all types, fencing walls. When making the roads, and if they build a lot, never demolish any, the State did not present any problem of urbanization, but they are just roads, streets, pavements incidental to steal as much land for agriculture.
Someone will object that these are rules to be communist state, because it is the state to build or at least to design anything that can be built. There are things that are not individuals but the state to gestiree. If only for a limited period of time, and then resell.
- Why in Italy, if you want to take up less urban space, not built taller?
- Why you want to keep at all costs and to contemplate the historic centers, and live thanks to tourism, instead of a park, and instead contemplate the beauty of modern? All buildings that are longer than 50 years may consider beauty to be preserved forever, so it must not be allowed to rebuild or renovate a building, but you have to build entirely new areas, while those on which there was a building, must be devoted to urban green spaces, parks, because if you have to build something modern, it must be done together with the road network and all other infrastructure.

road and urban development has to follow only the horizontal and vertical directions, compared to the reference meridian of Greenwich and that is parallel north-south and east-west. Even the agricultural land should be split along the same guidelines. Linear and orderly development of the roads would encourage the use of public transport, it would also help the railways to roads, power lines, aqueducts, and it would be even greater relationship with the natural environment. The traffic in this way not only reduce, but would be faster. The territory would be organized and divided into many rectangles of different sizes.
The streets should not be construed as a means to connect the existing cities, When, as they grow, the need for new roads, the road network becomes increasingly more dense and winding. They should be conceived as a means for the rational exploitation of territory, that cities must grow where they have been already made major
links. And if urban development followed the coastline, it would occupy territories that can not be exploited for agricultural purposes and, given the summer exodus to the sea, not only build houses for the winter and others just for the summer, building twice.
This is not to demolish everything that is old, we remember the past, but putting together the ancient and modern too close together, so we have old buildings inevitably overwhelmed by the smoke and dirt, surrounded by pollution because of the roads modern
street signs, trash cans, doodles on the walls, chewing gam-seeded onto every sidewalk, garbage in the streets because they are the center of city life. The contrast that comes from putting together buildings of historical epochs far, only generates disgust. So, in the care of older city centers, it is better to turn them into parks, demolishing buildings that are not part of the same historical period, and transforming the space on which it was demolished in small oases, green car! Closed to traffic, removing public offices and shops, so that no longer represent a "center" of the city, which will converge in the city life.
should have been built along the 45th parallel connecting Turin and Ferrara, along the 9 ° and 12 ° meridian between Rome and Berlin with a road straight and vertical, which makes little to the south along the Tyrrhenian coast south until you arrive in Sicily. In this way we would have some major road routes, with greater speed and simplicity in moving.
Cities should be developed along the major highways and rail links, linearly, rather than causing the continuous construction of new roads and road increasingly labyrinthine tangles, which forces people to use private transport instead of public ones. This would also involve the construction of roads to water systems, where the river channel to to carry water everywhere, to the arid regions, namely in below street, where also add lines for electrical cables, rather than fill the territory of lattice planes.
Making public works as planned, it also means to engage effectively unlimited, the unemployed, why go out and rebuilt gradually over time.

How do you bump up the shade of a house?
In our adversarial political-economic system, which should help in the capitalist accumulation of wealth, who has a lot of money but is more heavily taxed, as if it meant having lots of money to have stolen more. The
buying a property is burdened by taxes, in reality instead of hitting the big real estate as they wish, are recorded on the purchaser, steadily increasing the cost of a house. Among the many other contradictions, there is also the state, while it caused a progressive increase in the value of homes, spend money to build housing, or considers it useful to help those who bought his first house, as if, with these advantages, the value of properties were reduced.
In order to reduce the cost of building, we can simplify the buying and selling of property, removing it to estate agents and centralized in a public office such as the Land Registry, which would also be able to have full information on all properties for sale and under construction.
The design has costs that can be reduced by exploiting both the construction projects already implemented, either by design programmed only by the state. Currently, engineers and architects have earnings too easy.

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
In 1950 it was placed in order to overthrow the landowners, by dividing and distributing agricultural land, as you put the need to entrust the land to those who cultivate it, but in reality even in this over to someone else the agricultural property, and the task of cultivating it, is not a child abandonment. The agricultural property has been abandoned, entrusting it to a series of small owners, analyzed individually are no different from the old landowners. The farmers have abandoned the earth and they are all immigrants. It still allows the sharecropping or lease, that the earth belongs to those who do not cultivate it. The farm property was reduced to only unproductive small family firms. Agricultural land should belong to the State, be compacted, and divided more efficiently, along lines parallel and perpendicular to the reference Grenwich, directions along which all roads should be developed, and under them the underground channels for the distribution of water, electrical cables, and sewage systems. It was thus a vast nationwide network for distribution of river waters, which could arrive at the most arid areas, solving the problem of winter floods of the rivers that drained cederebbero their bed for cultivation purposes. The land can not belong to the State, sold and rented to farmers, until they have a benefit that is optimal management. In this way, farmers would not pay taxes in addition to affittto land. The State must not abandon to their own farmers, but to establish the direction of production of each plot, and then arrange for processing and sale of agricultural products. The economic development of a nation begins for agriculture, when in fact it is in excess, is a clear symptom of the inability and incapacity economic expansion, the solution is in increasing exports, although in poor countries, giving food, rather than write off debts (resulting from erroneous charges, such as military). The debts should never be canceled, because the underdeveloped countries have no right to political independence from richer nations. Only a state of economic and political dependence, can guarantee the preservation of peace is not eligible for a state of total autonomy. Freedom has its limits. All
sloping ground, so for example, along the mountain slopes along the sides of highways, railways or rivers, should not be abandoned lands, and then filled with weeds and garbage that will never be recovered, but should be implemented in steps, so that they can be viable, or even cultivated. The steps must be carried out preferably used because of rectangular wire mesh and irregular stone, in order to allow for the flow of water. An example of how it should be more fully exploited the land, are the rice terraces in the Chinese province of Yunnan. There should be a single square meter of land abandoned, occupied by weeds, trash, or used inappropriately. Rather than addressing the degreening of the Amazon, desertification in Africa, we do not think the way in which our region is exploited.
Squares, urban roads, you should plant trees. It dotrebbero grow useful plants, herbs or medicines, fruit trees such as chestnuts, walnuts, and even in pots, instead of so many stupid and monuments and fountains.
The streets are contaminated by bad behavior like throwing the filters of cigarettes, chewing gum, and all that is found to be thrown away without being able to have a litter box. I think people need to be educated to the care of public health, and ordered to clean up the streets.

What Color Shirt To Wear With Black Pants

The school serves the attainment of a qualification, which in turn should serve to a job, but how to determine what to study? what will your future if educational level is not expected immediately resulting in a job? Currently, the certainty with which to continue their studies can only belong to those who knows to have a recommendation, and then what is or may be, or become, if a nursery school for future recommendations? In other words it is not to improve but to maintain a social status, unless there is a continued immigration of aliens ready to take the places worst social.

The question is whether it is lawful to the phenomenon of the recommendation. The recommendation is the way in which it retains a social status. A father to his son the social opportunities of which he himself enjoyed. But who else but a father to a boy can transfer their experience and culture, rather than relying all'incuria of a public school, which sooner or later he will leave himself?!
Everyone from kids, have a lot of potential that we no longer have as adults, and should take advantage from an early age, and this is possible only are we educated and trained in the family already. and how to determine which field of study a student must choose, in order to avoid confusion, loss of time and drop-out?

If many young people drop out of school, this does not depend on a lower capacity, but the privileges achieved by some, which may lead others to choose a subordinate role in society, so that you experience many ingisutizie hidden in order to kick away people in need of a recommendation.

compulsory education must continue until the acquisition of the ability to read and write, or it must be associated with a job?
If you want the opportunity to continue studies beyond the minimum, you should combine the qualifications for a job so that you do not waste time in a state of unemployment, but then take over another type of selection made of the most difficult and promotions failures easier.

currently use are expected to get a special announcement, that should be abolished.
You make too selective as having the opportunity of a place for everyone, but they represent a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless, a waste of time and money. It is important that the study is fueled by direct access to a workplace, which guarantees economic, and be guaranteed a job even if it means having to share equally any minimum employment status. Any attempt to reform the public school is stopped by a confused chorus of protests by students and teachers. While teachers are concerned only to preserve their jobs rather than contribute to the efficiency of the education system, students, however, boycotting classes, why do not you love the school, why do not do any good. That teacher is a category of privileged workers: they not only never go on strike, so do not lose anything of salary, as is the case with all other workers, but for you to take advantage of students scioperino for them, with a force participation and social benefits which are not in any other category. It would be fair that every time there is a student strike, was being considered as a teachers' strike, with its curtailment of salary, as if the teachers were on strike, in order to inhibit this abnormal phenomenon of the student strike, which takes time to study and delays the educational attainment of young people. If young people want to protest and debate about the issues the school must do so in the evening hours of free time. The student protests only serve to provoke more in education spending, to pay for more teachers to increase their number, as if to change the school should just spend more. The school as an organization, however, remains the same. Students strike When, ignoring what he expects will have finished their studies, they are just fools who protest against someone who can not identify.
In school, students must be divided according to different behavioral characteristics, different attitudes, skills'. Keep them all together without distinction can 'only make it more' difficult teaching and learning time delay.
The differentiation of students in classrooms and schools, is to cover all aspects of identity 'and behavior, sex, social class, from bullying to inhibition, and this is not because' it must be provided only to some, considered the most ' the''good''chance 'to attain the highest' high education, judgments that are stupid and useless, but because 'bringing together people with similar characteristics, and' possible deal in a more 'simple and unique for their defect, and in exploiting the advantages. If you put together rather indiscriminately, should be much more 'time and effort to understand and enhance all the qualities' of each. Education must change with the organization of work. The education being made compulsory for all, all can lead to the highest level of studies, but at the same time is divided into many technical guidelines. But how does it shape the student with a specific interest? The school does not really decide which field of study to pursue, and therefore must remain generally the same for everyone, to the extent that is required.

The school is focused on a working occupation, But what happens when jobs are not there? What many students do not even have more reason to study, because they already know that their studies will be useless.
would therefore be useful to associate to study the possibility of a job, right from the start, ensuring that all their jobs. Combining the school, a specific work activity, through a reform of the right to work, it is more productive schooling.
Although the State has provided scholarships for the poor, won the only long after the profit school that is not really recognize all of the study from the same economic opportunities.
now to get a job contests are planned, which instead should be abolished. Being too selective, as it lacks the possibility of a place for everyone, they are already a waste of resources, engaging the competitors (especially those not recommended) in a study useless and a waste of time and even money.
that the study should be encouraged, not scholarships, but a job, that is a guarantee economic, social, and not just grades and titles now futile. The qualification must be associated to the workplace, even if it means having to share equally in work hours and income.
who dropped out of school? Those who lack a foundation of economic subsistence.
Students choose an address of studies that give them the chance to get some job in the future, instead of moving towards higher education such as scientific research, for which they do not know if you get a job.
Many students are forced to abandon their studies, or to give them an address less demanding, because they do not receive sufficient financial support from either family, the school must offer the least support, what could be the opportunity to enjoy a meal public, and if he continued his studies with success, even more.
public education is mandatory, as it can not establish an address to the studies, as it is a right for all, must be essential in their subjects and then have only one address, to be only theoretical, scientific and philosophical. It must be added numerous short courses and technical and professional, who can follow the development of the region where you live, and then a concrete future economic gain. The school must therefore be twofold.

The school from my point of view should be open both morning and evening. In fact, I think, in diverse times, that afternoon and evening, you should always keep in classes and rehearsals, because in this way we could follow the same lesson several times, for those who were late, and also because it is accessible to all, and all ages, therefore also for those in employment or deemed too late to start over, because we all have to learn something new, to better address the problem of unemployment. The school must be open to all and at all times, because culture is an important basis for the development of a nation.

The school must also make a selection, which on the basis of the conduct, aspirations, the potential of an individual, must divide the students in schools that follow different speeds. In this way there would be no rivalry between those students who cause a slowdown of teaching. Do not want to listen to the lesson, not wanting to study at home, it slows down and reduces programs to those who wants to study more. So it would be useful questions occur as a university, that is, outside of class hours in order to prevent the listlessness of the student, a phenomenon typical of the school. In this way, and that is bringing together students with the same capacity for learning, leisure students would not be overloaded with homework and further repetition: the school must recognize that life is made of a student's other needs, the school can not or is unable to meet, for which the student must return to the entertainment venues, and if missing, must organize it, otherwise the student will not be able to concentrate on their studies, because the possibility of relaxation is proportional to the possibility of merger.

Women and men are not equal. Women have a different kind of sensitivity and intelligence. The right to equal opportunities for women must be viewed in relation to the duties imposed on men. The student population is equalized, in reality, however, encourages women who have already monopolized the teaching at school and thus have embraced the possibility of academic success (given that academic success is or will become a prerogative of the sons of teachers) ; the male teachers were extinct. So I think they are necessary only schools whose teachers are men. Should also realize that the freedom of teaching, education of a child, can not be entrusted to one person (and autonomy), because there is an increased risk of poor will eventually find. Among the closed walls of a classroom happens that teachers do not teach anything, partly because the students want to study. Education must therefore be controlled not by parents but by a special camera from another room, or two teachers for each subject.

Strikes students highlight the waste of time for young people, public resources, the lack of awareness of students about their future. In public schools the student assemblies should only be permitted at times other than those of courses, or become an excuse for not studying, and already does a bit. The strike is really an excuse with which students (as well as the professors who want to work less and less) reduces the amount imposed on them in the study, and if anyone is able to study more instead, he was invited to give up.

Broadcasting can be a source of information and culture, but you should have different thematic stations with addresses in order to meet the cultural needs of everyone, and especially to get people to cultivate new ones.
The television programming should not adapt to the needs of all viewers to increase listening, but those preferences of viewers more diligent in improving quality.
Lacking quality television exerts a tyranny.
bullying that occur when we meet in front of the TV company, and did not agree on what program to follow, and always wins who wants to see the program less cultural.
There must therefore be a limit to the emergence of new channels, provided they address cultural educational information only.
The television should be repeated periodically in order to be followed at different times, and then by all.
Thus those who stay home because they are unemployed would be able to learn something more than watching television.
TV news should be different: the best choice to differentiate themselves in relation to political orientation, but they should also differ depending on the type of news.
broadcasts should be subtitled in English, as has happened with teletext, particularly programs for children, and that the cartoons, which should be used only for educational purposes, for example, depict a historical period like Asterix for example, while currently you leave the field only to Japanese cartoons. The scientific programs should be diversified, and oriented to an audience uneducated and not the most ignorant, because if it is made understandable all, it has already been acquired: it is an unnecessary repetition. I do not understand also why you send so many documentaries on animals, and never for example on plants, agriculture and gardening, or do not disclose the scientific theories of recent Nobel laureates such as Gell Mann. Even if you are transmitting classical music, you must specify the author notes, as subtitles.
I wonder why the lessons of the Consorzio Nettuno is transmitted only at night on RAI-2, not days, and why not deal with scientific issues. The motor activity
temper the body, and it should require one hour of gym a day, chosen by the student.
The school can not be compulsory, either because a requirement for consistency of principle or it is imposed by force, with a strict discipline, behavioral, or do not require this.
punishment inhibit a child. A child does not understand the causes, refuse, and along with them to school. You can not improve their intelligence without an end.
The school, taking up a lot of time for young people, takes a function that is not confined to lessons.
do not agree with the cyclical nature of the programs, because they never get to stop dealing with current topics.
education of a child would be facilitated by attendance at a school where teachers are, or men only or women only.
Culture is transmitted in several ways. Therefore, homework does not produce the same result that could produce even television, participation in extra courses and conferences. If in the evening refresher courses were held, bringing together all the classes into one, more in the classroom, the students behind the other, could accelerate their learning and have the opportunity to choose another teacher with whom to continue the course while maintaining the other subjects, the teachers themselves, though in this case it is necessary for all sections of the same school classes are held in the same field at the same times.